INSTITUTIONAL FACTORS OF CONSUMER BEHAVIOR IN THE CONTEXT OF DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION
Abstract
The article examines the institutional transformation of consumer behavior under the influence of ongoing digitalization, focusing on how digital technologies reshape the structural logic of economic interaction. The paper is devoted to uncovering the deep interdependence between institutional environments and individual decision-making in the context of algorithmically mediated markets. The study aims to conceptually clarify how consumer choices are increasingly embedded within dynamic digital systems that blend formal rules, platform-specific norms, algorithmic architectures, and informal behavioral codes. The relevance of this investigation is determined by the growing complexity of digital consumption, where users interact with personalized recommendation systems, automated filtering, and interface design patterns that profoundly influence preferences, perceptions of risk, and trust formation. Methodologically, the research employs a multidisciplinary framework that integrates insights from new institutional economics, behavioral economics, and digital sociology. The analysis is structured across three institutional levels: macro (regulatory frameworks, national digitalization strategies, legal and supervisory mechanisms), meso (platform governance, internal platform policies, algorithmic regulation, interface logic), and micro (cultural norms, digital literacy, trust, heuristics). The findings demonstrate that digital platforms not only act as market intermediaries but also as institutional actors that set implicit norms, filter visibility, and organize trust infrastructures without full regulatory accountability. As digital environments become more autonomous, institutional gaps widen, creating a need for adaptive, transparent, and ethically grounded mechanisms of behavioral coordination. The practical contribution of the article lies in its capacity to inform the design of institutional frameworks that balance innovation and fairness in digital markets, enhance user agency, and support resilience in consumer decision-making under conditions of high technological dynamism and structural uncertainty.
References
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press. 159 p.
Williamson, O. E. (1998). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. Free Press. 468 p.
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action (Political Economy of Institutions and Decisions). Cambridge University Press. 298 p.
Greif, A. (2006). Institutions and the Path to the Modern Economy: Lessons from Medieval Trade (Political Economy of Institutions and Decisions). Cambridge University Press. 526 p.
Berente N., Seidel, S. (2022). Digital Technologies: Carrier or Trigger for Institutional Change in Digital Transformation? In: Digital Transformation and Institutional Theory. Emerald Publishing. Pp. 197-209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X20220000083008
Buckley, R., Arner, D., Barberis, J. The Evolution of Fintech: A New Post-Crisis Paradigm? Georgetown Journal of International Law. 2016. Vol. 47. Pp. 1271-1319. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2676553
Липов В. Суперечності віртуальної конкуренції як результат алгоритмізації управління на цифрових платформах: інституційний контекст. Економічна теорія. 2022. Вип. 1(27). С. 26-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/etet2022.01.026
Дубина М., Попело О., Тарасенко О. Інституційні трансформації фінансової системи України в умовах розвитку цифрової економіки. Проблеми і перспективи економіки та управління. 2021. Вип. 1(25). С. 91-110. DOI: https://doi.org/0.25140/2411-5215-2021-1(25)-91-110
Брязкало М., Юрченко О. Інституційні чинники цифрової трансформації економіки. Цифрова економіка та економічна безпека. 2024. Вип. 5(14). С. 67-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/dees.14-10
Brynjolfsson E., McAfee A. (2016). The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies. Norton & Company. 336 p.
Верховна Рада України. Закон України «Про захист персональних даних» 2297-VI від 18.01.2025. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2297-17#Text (дата звернення: 18.03.2025).
Програма розвитку ООН в Україні. Думки і погляди населення України щодо державних електронних послуг у 2023 році: аналітичний звіт. 2024. 67 с. URL: https://www.undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/files/2024-01/undp-ua-e-services-use-omnibus-2023.pdf (дата звернення: 27.03.2025).
Hardesty L. The history of Amazon's recommendation algorithm. Available at: https://www.amazon.science/the-history-of-amazons-recommendation-algorithm (accessed March 29, 2025).
Sharma D., Aggarwal D., Saxena A. Content Based Recommendation System on Netflix Data. International Journal of Research In Science & Engineering. 2024. Vol. 4. Pp. 19-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55529/ijrise.42.19.26
Thaler R.H., Sunstein C.R. (2009). Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. Penguin Books. 312 p.
Teubner T., Graul A. Only one room left! How scarcity cues affect booking intentions on hospitality platforms. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications. 2019. Vol. 39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2019.100910
Maslowska E., Malthouse E.C., Bernritter S.F. Too Good To Be True: The Role of Online Reviews’ Features in Probability to Buy. International Journal of Advertising. 2017. Vol 36(1). Pp. 142-163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2016.1195622
Arizal N., Nofrizal, Dwika Listihana, W., Hadiyati. Gen Z Customer Loyalty in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model of Trust, Website Design, and Security. Journal of Internet Commerce. 2024. Vol. 23(2). Pp. 121-143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15332861.2024.2330812
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press. 159 p.
Williamson, O. E. (1998). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. Free Press. 468 p.
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action (Political Economy of Institutions and Decisions). Cambridge University Press. 298 p.
Greif, A. (2006). Institutions and the Path to the Modern Economy: Lessons from Medieval Trade (Political Economy of Institutions and Decisions). Cambridge University Press. 526 p.
Berente N., Seidel, S. (2022). Digital Technologies: Carrier or Trigger for Institutional Change in Digital Transformation? In: Digital Transformation and Institutional Theory. Emerald Publishing. Pp. 197-209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X20220000083008
Buckley, R., Arner, D., Barberis, J. The Evolution of Fintech: A New Post-Crisis Paradigm? Georgetown Journal of International Law. 2016. Vol. 47. Pp. 1271-1319. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2676553
Lypov V. Superechnosti virtualnoi konkurentsii yak rezultat alhorytmizatsii upravlinnia na tsyfrovykh platformakh: instytutsiinyi kontekst [Contradictions of Virtual Competition as a Result of Algorithmic Governance on Digital Platforms: Institutional Context]. Ekonomichna teoriia. 2022. 1(27). P. 26-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/etet2022.01.026
Dubyna M., Popelo O., Tarasenko O. Instytutsiini transformatsii finansovoi systemy Ukrainy v umovakh rozvytku tsyfrovoi ekonomiky [Institutional Transformations of Ukraine’s Financial System under the Development of the Digital Economy]. Problemy i perspektyvy ekonomiky ta upravlinnia. 2021. 1(25). P. 91-110. DOI: https://doi.org/0.25140/2411-5215-2021-1(25)-91-110
Briazkalo M., Yurchenko O. Instytutsiini chynnyky tsyfrovoi transformatsii ekonomiky [Institutional Factors of Digital Economic Transformation]. Tsyfrova ekonomika ta ekonomichna bezpeka. 2024. 5(14). P. 67-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/dees.14-10
Brynjolfsson E., McAfee A. (2016). The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies. Norton & Company. 336 p.
Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. Zakon Ukrainy “Pro zakhyst personalʹnykh danykh” 2297-VI vid 18.01.2025 [Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Law of Ukraine “On Personal Data Protection” No. 2297-VI dated January 18, 2025]. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2297-17#Text (accessed March 18, 2025).
Prohrama rozvytku OON v Ukraini. Dumky i pohliady naselennia Ukrainy shchodo derzhavnykh elektronnykh posluh u 2023 rotsi: analitychnyi zvit [United Nations Development Programme in Ukraine. Opinions and Views of the Population of Ukraine on Public E-Services in 2023: Analytical Report]. 2024. 67 p. Available at: https://www.undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/files/2024-01/undp-ua-e-services-use-omnibus-2023.pdf (accessed March 27, 2025).
Hardesty L. The history of Amazon's recommendation algorithm. Available at: https://www.amazon.science/the-history-of-amazons-recommendation-algorithm (accessed March 29, 2025).
Sharma D., Aggarwal D., Saxena A. Content Based Recommendation System on Netflix Data. International Journal of Research In Science & Engineering. 2024. Vol. 4. Pp. 19-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55529/ijrise.42.19.26
Thaler R.H., Sunstein C.R. (2009). Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. Penguin Books. 312 p.
Teubner T., Graul A. Only one room left! How scarcity cues affect booking intentions on hospitality platforms. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications. 2019. Vol. 39. DOI: 10.1016/j.elerap.2019.100910.
Maslowska E., Malthouse E.C., Bernritter S.F. Too Good To Be True: The Role of Online Reviews’ Features in Probability to Buy. International Journal of Advertising. 2017. Vol 36(1). Pp. 142-163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2016.1195622
Arizal N., Nofrizal, Dwika Listihana, W., Hadiyati. Gen Z Customer Loyalty in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model of Trust, Website Design, and Security. Journal of Internet Commerce. 2024. Vol. 23(2). Pp. 121-143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15332861.2024.2330812